Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Affilia
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Giles, J.
Right arrow Articles by Curreen, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Phases of Growth for Abused New Zealand Women

A Comparison With Other Studies

Janice Giles

Auckland University of Technology, New Zealand, janicegiles{at}ihug.co.nz

Helen Curreen

Auckland University of Technology, New Zealand, helen.curreen{at}aut.ac.nz

The goal of this grounded-theory qualitative study is to inform practice for working with New Zealand women who experience male partner abuse. The basic psychosocial process of growing through adversity emerged as salient for all 10 participants. This process is composed of three highly interactive core categories (finding a path beyond abuse, getting a life, and becoming myself) and five sequential phases (falling for love, taking control, securing a base, making sense of it, and being myself). This article focuses on the phases of the process and reports patterns that are consistent with other studies that have identified phases of the process.

Key Words: domestic violence • personal growth • recovery

References

  • Adams, P.J., Towns, A., & Gavey, N. (1995). Dominance and entitlement: The rhetoric men use to discuss their violence towards women. Discourse and Society, 6, 387-406.[CrossRef]
  • Balzer, R. (1999). Hamilton Abuse Intervention Project: The Aoteoroa experience. In M. F. Shepard & E. L. Pence (Eds.), Coordinating community responses to domestic violence: Lessons from Duluth and beyond (pp. 23-254). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Campbell, J.C., Rose, L., Kub, J., & Nedd, D. (1998). Voices of strength and resistance: A contextual and longitudinal analysis of women's responses to battering. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 13, 74-762.
  • Eisikovits, Z. (1999). Talking control: Metaphors used by battered women. Violence Against Women, 5, 84-868.
  • Eisikovits, Z., Buchbinder, E., & Mor, M. (1998). "What it was won't be anymore": Reaching the turning point in coping with intimate violence. Affilia, 13, 41-434.
  • Eisikovits, Z., Goldblatt, H., & Winstok, Z. (1999). Partner accounts of intimate violence: Towards a theoretical model. Families in Society, 80, 60-620.
  • Fanslow, J.L., & Robinson, E. (2004). Violence against women in New Zealand: Prevalence and health consequences. New Zealand Medical Journal, 117(1206), 1-12.
  • Ferraro, K.J., & Johnson, J.M. (1983). How women experience battering: The process of victimization. Social Problems, 30, 32-339.
  • Giles, J.R. (2004). Growing through adversity: Becoming women who live without partner abuse. A grounded theory study. Unpublished master's thesis, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand.
  • Giles, J.R. (2005). A guide to supporting women who experience abuse by male partners. Auckland, New Zealand: Printsprint.
  • Giles, J.R., Curreen, H.M., & Adamson, C.E. (2005). The social sanctioning of partner abuse: Perpetuating the message that partner abuse is acceptable in New Zealand. Social Policy Journal of New Zealand, 26, 9-116.
  • Glaser, B.G. (1978). Theoretical sensitivity: Advances in the methodology of grounded theory. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.
  • Glaser, B.G. (1992). Basics of grounded theory analysis: Emergence vs. forcing. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.
  • Glaser, B.G., & Strauss, A.L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
  • Glover, M. (1995). Te puna roimat. Maori women's experience of male partner violence: 7 case studies. Hamilton, New Zealand: University of Waikato.
  • Hagar, D.M. (2002). Domestic violence and mental illness: Is there a relationship? Incite, 2(2), 2-34.
  • Hand, J., Elizabeth, V., Martin, B., Rauwhero, H., Burton, M., Selby, S., et al. (2002). Free from abuse. What women say and what can be done. Auckland, New Zealand: Public Health Promotion, Auckland District Health Board.
  • Kearney, M. (2001). Enduring love: A grounded formal theory of women's experience of domestic violence. Research in Nursing & Health, 24, 27-282.[CrossRef]
  • Kools, S., McCarthy, M., Durham, R., & Robrecht, L. (1996). Dimensional analysis: Broadening the conception of grounded theory. Qualitative Health Research, 6, 31-330.
  • Krug, E., Dahlberg, L., Mercy, J., Zwi, A., & Lozano, R. (2002). World report on violence and health. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization.
  • Landenburger, K.M. (1989). A process of entrapment in and recovery from an abusive relationship. Issues in Mental Health Nursing, 10, 20-227.
  • Landenburger, K.M. (1998a). The dynamics of leaving and recovering from an abusive relationship. Journal of Obstetric Gynecologic and Neonatal Nursing, 27, 70-706.
  • Landenburger, K.M. (1998b). Exploration of women's identity: Clinical approaches with abused women. In J. C. Campbell (Ed.), Empowering survivors of abuse: Health care for battered women and their children (pp. 6-69). London: Sage.
  • Lempert, L.B. (1996). Women's strategies for survival: Developing agency in abusive relationships. Journal of Family Violence, 11, 26-289.
  • Lempert, L.B. (1997). The line in the sand: Definitional dialogues in abusive relationships. In A. Strauss & J. Corbin (Eds.), Grounded theory in practice (pp. 14-170). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Mead, G.H. (1992). Mind, self, & society: From the standpoint of a social behaviorist (Vol. 1). Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Original work published 1934)
  • Merritt-Gray, M., & Wuest, J. (1995). Counteracting abuse and breaking free: The process of leaving revealed through women's voices. Health Care for Women International, 16, 39-412.
  • Mills, T. (1985). The assault on the self: Stages in coping with battering husbands. Qualitative Sociology, 8, 10-123.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Schatzman, L. (1991). Dimensional analysis: Notes on an alternative approach to the grounding of theory in qualitative research. In D. R. Maines (Ed.), Social organizations and social process: Essays in honor of Anselm Strauss (pp. 30-314). New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
  • Statistics New Zealand. (2002). Census snapshot: Pacific peoples. Wellington: Author.
  • Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Towns, A., & Adams, P. (2000). "If I really loved him enough, he would be okay." Violence Against Women, 6, 55-585.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Ulrich, Y.C. (1991). Women's reasons for leaving abusive spouses. Health Care for Women International, 12, 46-473.
  • Ulrich, Y.C. (1998). What helped most in leaving spouse abuse. In J. C. Campbell (Ed.), Empowering survivors of abuse: Health care for battered women (pp. 7-78). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Wuest, J., & Merritt-Gray, M. (1999). Not going back: Sustaining the separation in the process of leaving abusive relationships. Violence Against Women, 5, 11-135.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Wuest, J., & Merritt-Gray, M. (2001). Beyond survival: Reclaiming self after leaving an abusive male partner. Canadian Journal of Nursing Research, 32(4), 7-94.
  • Wuest, J., & Merritt-Gray, M. (2002). While leaving abusive male partners, women engage in a four-stage process of reclaiming self. Evidence-Based Nursing, 5(2), 60.[Free Full Text]

Affilia, Vol. 22, No. 4, 371-384 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/0886109907306310


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Giles, J.
Right arrow Articles by Curreen, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?