This Article Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (1) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Postmus, J. L. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Challenging the Negative Assumptions Surrounding Civil Protection Orders

A Guide for Advocates

Rutgers University, postmus{at}rci.rutgers.edu

Restraining orders, often used as the first line of protection for battered women, are surrounded by negative assumptions and beliefs held by key stakeholders who question their use and effectiveness. This article evaluates current research on restraining orders by describing four negative assumptions that were found in a review of qualitative and quantitative research. Each negative assumption includes a brief discussion of the origin of the assumption and a synthesis of the research that has addressed each assumption. The article concludes with strategies for advocates for battered women and practitioners to use when challenging the negative assumptions held by others.

Key Words: battered women • civil protection order • domestic violence • restraining order

Affilia, Vol. 22, No. 4, 347-356 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/0886109907306328


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. L. Postmus, M. Severson, M. Berry, and J. A. Yoo Women's Experiences of Violence and Seeking Help Violence Against Women, July 1, 2009; 15(7): 852 - 868. [Abstract] [PDF]