This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Gillespie, D. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Help that Disables: The Paradox of Conventional Goodness

Goodrich Scholarship Program, University of Nebraska, Omaha

When helping others is an expression of conventional goodness, it stifles women's cognitive and emotional development and disables those they are trying to help. Drawing on Gilligan's theory of moral development, the author analyzes the dysfunctional aspects of helping and the paradox of conventional goodness. She argues that women persist in this behavior because they have developed a conceptual schema that habitually guides them in resolving moral dilemmas. Practitioners and educators need to explore these issues further, since the majority of social workers are women and hence have been socialized to equate "helping" with being "good."

Affilia, Vol. 2, No. 2, 7-22 (1987)
DOI: 10.1177/088610998700200203


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?